More than a few Israelis have been taking perverse pleasure in
witnessing the struggles of the Argentinean football team in the world cup tournament in Russia. Considering their all-star line-up, the
Argentinians were expected to make easy progress to the last 16 of the
tournament. And yet, it was not quite how things turned out, even if
they did finally achieve this objective. A draw against lowly Iceland,
and a resounding loss to Croatia did not help their cause along the
way. And the unceremonious dumping of the Argentinean team out of the
tournament by France in the round of 16 has led many in Israel to
consider this to be karma.
The reason for the
pleasure taken by Israelis in Argentina's poor performances, is because
of the cancellation of the friendly warm-up match that was scheduled to
take place between the national teams of Israel and Argentina just prior
to the start of the world cup tournament. Even Israeli Defense
Minister Avigdor Liberman jumped on the bandwagon by tweeting to
congratulate Iceland on their efforts to restrict Argentina to a 1-1
draw. In this game, one of the world's most famous and decorated
players, Lionel Messi, missed a penalty attempt for Argentina that could have won the game for his team. Liberman
found it appropriate to link the unsatisfactory result for Argentina
with the cancellation of their game against Israel.
While
Argentina's failures in this world cup tournament are difficult to
conceal, it is a little disingenuous to claim that their poor form can
be attributed to the cancellation of the warm-up game against Israel.
And it is even more disingenuous to blame the Argentineans for the
cancellation of this game. I believe that the blame for this can
be laid fimly at the feet of the Israeli government, led by Prime Minister
Netanyahu and Minister for Culture and Sport Miri Regev.
The
tradition of Argentina playing pre-world cup warm-up games against
Israel goes back to 1986. In fact, after a warm-up game against Israel
before the world cup tournament in 1986, Argentina went on to win the
tournament. After a warm-up game against Israel in 1990, the
Argentinean team faltered only at the final hurdle when losing to
Germany in the final match of the tournament. So there are some who
consider this warm-up game to be something of a lucky omen for the
Argentineans. And apparently some who consider the cancellation of the
game this year to be a poison chalice for Argentina's fortunes. In
spite of all of the emotions surrounding the cancellation of the game, I
consider the Argentineans to be entirely blameless for the fact that
the game against Israel ultimately did not take place.
The
game was set against the backdrop of great efforts on the part of the
Boycott, Divest, Sanctions movement (BDS) to bring discredit and damage
to Israel in a public way. It was clear that the BDS movement was going
to jump at this opportunity to put pressure on Argentina to cancel the
game in order to use the chance to show that there is public opposition
to Israel in every possible way. And BDS did not disappoint. What was
disappointing, however, was the response to this by the Israeli
government.
The game was originally scheduled to be
played in Haifa, and was billed as a friendly warm-up game. In
precisely the same way that previous games have been played before.
Sensing an opportunity to make something more of it, Minister of Culture
and Sport Miri Regev succeeded in convincing the Argentineans to agree
to move the game to the Teddy Stadium in Jerusalem, and to bill it as a
game that formed part of Israel's celebration of 70 years of
independence. Not only was this contrary to the original spirit of the
game, it was a big mistake on the part of the Israeli government. It
was essentially, the first step towards the ultimate cancellation of the
game. I believe that the Argentinean Football Association would have
been able and willing to withstand the pressure put on it by BDS and
other anti-Israel protesters to allow this game to go ahead as planned
in its original format. Once the game was given a much higher profile
and billing and moved to Jerusalem to be part of Israel's 70th
anniversary of independence, the Israeli government was inviting
attention and ultimate disaster. In the process, it created a very
difficult and unwelcome situation for the Argentinean Football
Association.
The record shows that so much pressure
was placed on the Argentinean Football Association and its players,
that they decided to call off the game. Players and their families were
threatened with death if they chose to go through with the game. I
condemn in the strongest terms the terrorists who think that it is OK to
make death threats against the families of football players who are
just doing their job in representing family, club and country. It is
clear that these terrorists will stop at nothing in their attempts to
bring about the destruction of Israel, even if it means threatening the
lives of innocent people. Of course, their efforts will not succeed.
My sympathy goes out to the Argentinean Football Association and players
who were willing to agree to the friendly game in the first place,
knowing full well that they would come under immense public pressure for
their decision. I am sure that I would have taken the same decision to cancel the game as
they took if I was in their shoes. Unfortunately, officials in the
Israeli government could not sufficiently recognise the effort that
friends of Israel are prepared to make by agreeing to play here, despite
the obvious negative reaction that they would have to endure. Instead
of lending a hand to support the Argentinean Football Association and
its players to feel justified in proceeding with the game, apparently
these same government officials felt that it would be appropriate to
place even more pressure on our Argentinean friends by moving the game
to Jerusalem, and giving it a profile that was never originally
intended.
Israel has every right and even a
responsibility to assert its sovereignty, and to assert sovereignty over
Jerusalem as its capital. But Israel also has the responsibility to
pick its fights, and to choose the appropriate moments to assert this
sovereignty. Israel also has the responsibility to support friends who
are prepared to swim against the tide in supporting Israel when popular
opinion may not necessarily do so. These things should not be taken
for granted. The unfortunate reality is that the rules that apply to
other countries do not necessarily apply to Israel. As much as it an
unacceptable situation and one that we should all fight against with
every fibre of our being, it is nonetheless the reality and cannot be
ignored. It would be negligent for the Israeli government to behave in a
way that simply ignores this reality.
The cancellation
of the football match was no victory for Israel, despite Miri Regev
feeling that she stood her ground and asserted Israel's sovereignty.
Besides denying Israel football fans the opportunity to watch talented
footballers like Messi and his teammates, it handed a public relations
victory to BDS. And it left the Argentinean Football Association
wondering whether it is worth considering playing against Israel in the
future given the unfortunate way in which the events unfolded. There
was a significant lack of support coming from the Israeli government for
them. Surely, the government has a responsibility to do what is
ultimately in Israel's best interests? Sometimes it is better to be
smart rather than to be right.
The next test for
the Israeli government is going to be the 2019 Eurovision song
competition that is due to be hosted by Israel. There is already a
strong body of international opinion that says that this competition
should not be held in Israel next year. And BDS have moved into high
gear to support them. On the other side, Miri Regev is on record saying
that she would prefer the Eurovision not to be held in Israel rather
than not hold it in Jerusalem. She may be granted her wish, in the same
way as her wish for the football game was granted. Again, this will
not be chalked up as a success for Regev nor for Israel.